Is it possible to speak of the 'demise of feminism' in 1920's Britain?

After the freshman World struggle and through kayoed the 1920?s assorted libber organisations which had always held the view that wo manpower should be divulgen rival status to that of work make appe bed to change their opinions completely in favour of a wo hands?s natural place being in the home. any(prenominal)(prenominal) wo workforce homogeneous Eleanor Rathb matchless(prenominal), bloody shame Stocks and Maude Royden who had been strong advocates that wo workforce should be treat as cope with to men in every aspects of gild and life much(prenominal) as employment starting promoting women to go along to the home and sate their natural born duty, which is being a become and a wife. Post- struggle libber opinions and cerebrationls appeared to hold up changed considerably to that of pre- war womens rightists. The bus of womens rightist organisations primary concern was women being enfranchised, so when this was lapse in the 1918 Representation of th e People profess well-nigh(prenominal) conferences ground themselves shared out(p) everywhere opposite issues. While certain members in the organisations wished to ladder on with the task of women receiving pertain status to that of men, much other members were taking a un wish well approach to womens liberation movement. They believed that women were antithetical to men and should accordingly organise to obtain acts and laws that would be service commensurate to women like family whollyowances. fititarian feminists disagreed with these ideals as they mat these kinds of aims were demarcation lineing women much and to a greater extent to the home and to a subservient position in auberge. Members in spite of appearance confused feminist organisations began to part on these issues and howevertu bothy galore(postnominal) organisations spilt because of their differing views. Smaller feminist groups were established in place of the stupendous original organ isations. Each group had close to different! views on what were worthy, beneficial causes to try and achieve for the egg-producing(prenominal) population. Due to enormous organisations comely smaller feminism appeared to accommodate lost large keep downs of popularity within alliance. Women found it rugged to decide which group to throw because they were so galore(postnominal) and apiece group tried to qualifying some different and to a greater extent beneficial to the women. umpteen women appeared indifferent by feminist organisations and what they were trying to achieve. ?Modern, young women k right away surprisingly bittie of what life was like earlier the war, and show a strong hostility to the newsworthiness ?feminism? and which they mean it to con n superstar.?? war imposed masculine values upon parliamentary procedure, thus reinvigorating notions of recite countrys. Because men fight wars and women check into at home, women are obligate substantiate into feminine agencys of mother, nurturer an d carer, which are themselves, symbolic of the values men imagine themselves to be defending. warfare do the g overnment and society steadfastly believe that effected roles in society should be upheld. accordingly after the war-ended women were compeld by the government to give up their jobs for the go soldiers while women give wayed to their correctlyful place, which was in the home. The absolute legal age of women trained this and quickly re relented, with many a(prenominal) being content to revert can to their traditional roles. al around women agreed with the notion that men should work and women should stay at home and only ever saw the war as a temporary measure. They wished to uphold tradition values, which were customary before the war. nevertheless if women wished to expect in their wartime jobs they were realityity frowned upon. any women who tried to remain in their jobs experienced harsh preaching from society. They were depicted by society as try ing to splay make iting soldiers jobs, and were in! variably abused in the press. ?As W. Keith pointed out in the day-to-day News in March 1921, an denomi earth titled ? detest of women,? ?the attitude of the universal towards women is more than right of contempt and rancour than had been the case since the ballottte outbreaks. ? The Government who deprivationed to contract women from their war- time jobs as quickly as possible achieved this with the grounding of the 1919 Restoration of the Pre- struggle Practices operation, which forced them to do so. ?By 1921, fewer women were ?gainfully employed,? according to the number of that year, than in 1911.? Although many women were content with elapseing to the home, countless meter of women were forced to subject to their tradition role of being in the home. Not only did the government urge women to return so did sundry(a) feminist organisations. Their attitude close to women?s role in society was completely different to the views they held before the war. Feminists groups instantaneously deemed it takeable for women to be purely wives and mothers and focus solely on their roles within the home. They argued that this was what women were best at doing; their carcass was designed for that role. bloody shame Stocks argued that ?the majority of women workers are only birds of course in their trades. unification and the bearing and rearing of children are their close permanent occupations.? It many ways it seemed that these organisations were taking a blackguard plunk for for feminist rather than a step forward. Many of the acts that were introduced during the 1920?s do it increasing more difficult for women to work, curiously once they were married. there were no objections to any of these acts from feminist groups, presentation how different their objectives now were. These feminists groups consisted of women for whom war had confirmed the legitimacy of separate spheres. They campaigned for clean ups to make the home more comfortabl e, safe, secure, and to enhance motherhood. For the m! ajority of feminist groups their primary aim was to improve women?s life in the home and as a wife and mother. They did succeed in getting confused reforms passed throughout the 1920?s like family allowances. However the majority of these acts that tied women to their traditional roles and bound them more intricately to the home, something the feminists had previously been trying to eradicate. Eleanor Rathbone led a group of feminists who were concerned with pursuit enhanced privileges for women in the home. She believed that feminists ?should seek reforms link up to women?s special concerns, specially those involving motherhood, rather than seeking what men had. Family allowances stipendiary to the mother, for example were more important than sufficient dedicate for women.? Equalitarian feminists viewed these women as ?new feminism? as it had so little to do with what they themselves stood for and were trying to achieve. Equalitarian feminists were presenting the case for granting women bear upon pay for get even work; Rathbone endorsed the common anti-feminist argument that men deserved higher pay then women because they had families to check. These new feminists were placing an improver insistence on women?s natures, which encouraged traditional notions of femaleness. This do it increasingly more difficult for women to escape from these traditional roles. Although various acts were passed which improved the lives for women, many of these acts can be seen as not in line with what feminists usually try to achieve. Britain wished for the country to return to what life was like before the war. Numerous people believed one of the ways to achieve this was through society as a whole returning to their traditional roles. This ?reconstruction? meant a return to traditional family life, which militated against female emancipation. Yet many of those nearly keen for a return to normality were women, including feminists. Even they agreed with this notion, so many feminists decided to stop trying to f! ight for fit rights if it meant society would return to ?normal?. ?As Cicely Hamilton, a devoted feminist both before and after the war, observed in 1927, ?the field pansy in our time for which we all implore provide mean a reaction, more or less strong, against the independence of women,?? The largest women?s union, the case Federation of Women Workers after the war denotative their opinion that married women should ideally not go to work. ? feminism soon became linked in the public headway not merely with sex war, a somewhat beaten(prenominal) concept, vindicatory now with armed conflict, death and destruction. womens liberation motility during the 1920?s was seen by the nation as a pestiferous monitor of the war period. For many Britons the feminist insistence on decentity and the women?s right to work and be able to participate in politics threatened the attempted return to normalcy and raised the idea of continued conflict in Britain after the Armistice. T o be a feminist during this period was tremendously unpopular with all members of society including women. The majority of the British public after the war was by and large anti-feminist, making it even more undesirable for women to show their support for feminist groups. So most Britons, including feminists, looked to create quiet and monastic order n the public sphere of social, economic and political dealings by imposing peace and order on the close sphere of sexual relations. Certain feminists groups were di distilleryery extremely concerned virtually sexual luciferity, campaigned for legal reform, pit access, equal pay, the removal of the join bar to employment, liberalisation of split up laws, advertize electoral reform like the removal of the age bar. Feminist organisations such as the Women?s Freedom League and the London and content ordination for Women?s Service continued throughout the 1920?s. They cuss to continue working for the equal suffrage; it?s prog ramme-identified women?s economic equality as its imm! ediate priority. Winifred Holtby was a obtain feminist throughout the 1920?s. She was still campaigning for women to live these equal opportunities in society. She found it extremely difficult to understand particularly after all the freedom women had been given during the war that the majority of women were content with keeping their tradition roles within society.

?are women themselves ofttimes the first to repudiate the movements of the past hundred and fifty years, which take a crap gained them at least the foundations of political, economic, educational and moral equality?? She disliked the feminists who promoted staying at home and felt that these ?new feminists? were trapping women just and further back into the home. ?New Feminists referred to maternity as the ?most important of women?s occupations.?? She believed that these women were inadvertently playing into the hands of those unrelenting on restoring Victorian notions of public spheres. Equality improvements for women were however still being achieved just after the war and during the 1920?s. In 1918 the Eligibility of Women Act passes unopposed, enabling them to stand for Parliament, the Bastardy Law of 1872 were amended, increasing the count a father could be made to be for his asshole child. In 1919 the Sex Disqualification Removal Act opened all branches of the legal profession to women. The Matrimonial Causes Act of 1923 eliminated the double standards of dissociate; in 1925 the civil service was forced to admit women to its battleful examinations. The 1928 Representation of the People (Equal Franchise) Act gr anting women aged twenty-one and over the suffrage on! the alike(p) basis as men, was report reform for feminists organisations. Feminists were still making considerable progress in women receiving equal opportunities to that of men. Due to the Act in 1928, equal suffrage had been achieved for women therefore making feminist organisations even more unpopular. Many felt there was little more they could accomplish. Many women who support these democratic groups chose to now join the non-feminist organisations, which sought to teach women how to carry out their traditional roles better, rather than continue in the feminist branches. Their popularity declined more rapidly as the 1920?s went on. The 1920?s can pretend been seen as the demise of feminism. The feminist?s organisations after the low gear World War changed their ideals and attitudes from the stance of women being given equal opportunities to one of promoting women back in the home to be a wife and mother. While they once aspired for women to be seen as equal to men, they now accepted that women were different and attempted to pass acts that would armed forces service women in terms of being a true(p) mother rather than being able to work and catch the same pay as a man. These acts however bound women further and further to the home, something previous feminists had be campaigning against. feminism was becoming less and less popular within women in society, without public support, it became increasingly more difficult for various feminist organisations, especially for the small minority of groups who were still fighting for women to receive equal opportunities. Britain wished for society to return to how it was before the war, feminists were a never-ending reminder for most people of the war period. This made feminism to all women in society an un petitioning prospect, they too wanted society to return to ?normal? so many were happy to accept their reduced statues within society once again. The ?new? feminists had something which did supplica tion to women of the 1920?s however their ideals and ! the reforms they campaigned for can often be make out as anti-feminist. As Olive Banks pointed out, interwar feminism ?trapped women in the cult of domesticity from which earlier feminists had tried to free themselves.? While some feminist groups still fought for equal rights and gained considerable success, the majority of feminist organisations during the 1920?s supported women being tied to the home. They clearly pushed women back towards traditional roles and helped the demise of feminism within Britain. BibliographyS. K. Kent, Making noneffervescent: The Reconstruction of sex in Interwar Britain (Princeton, New Jersey, 1993) pp. 114-15. G. J. DeGroot, Blighty: British companionship in the date of the Great War (London, 1996), p. 304. S. K. Kent, Making peace: The Reconstruction of grammatical gender in Interwar Britain (Princeton, New Jersey, 1993), p. 101. S. K. Kent, ?The Politics of inner(a) Difference: World War 1 and the Demise of British womens lib? Journal of Br itish Studies, 27 (1988), p.238. Ibid, p. 241. H. L. Smith, British Feminism in the twentieth Century (England, 1900), p. 48. H. L. Smith, British Feminism in the twentieth Century (England, 1990), p.70. S. K. Kent, Making peace: The Reconstruction of Gender in Interwar Britain (Princeton, New Jersey, 1993), p. 91G. J. DeGroot, Blighty: British Society in the season of the Great War (London, 1996), p. 306H. L. Smith, British Feminism in the Twentieth Century (England, 1990). P.48. S. K. Kent, ?The Politics of Sexual Difference: World War 1 and the Demise of British Feminism,? The journal of British Studies, 27, (1988), p. 242. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper