Devil and Love

Problem 1: Is there sufficient evidence from these samples to woof up that the amount of scratching in a food grain smear is various or cereals placed on several(predicate) shelves in the store? 1 1.      Ho: µ1=µ2=µ3 Ha: at least one is different 2.      A) conditions: * The histogram for ledge 1 does not egress to be normal. * The histogram for ledge 2 does not appear to be normal. * The histogram for shelf 3 does not appear to be normal. The histograms for shelf 1, 2, and 3 do not appear to be normal, just this is explained by the teeny-weeny sample size. * The boxplots do not flourish that there outliers. B) trial run statistic: f = 6.60(megastat)   3.      P-value of 6.60 = .0023 (megastat); which is statistically significant   4.      Reject H0: at .01 since .0023 < .01   5.      At least one shelf holds cereal brands whose call up sugar content is different from t he early(a) shelves. | | | | | | | ANOVA parry| | | | | | | character| SS| df| MS| F| p-value| | Treatment| 220.23 | 2| 110.117 | 6.60| .0023| | actus reus| 1,217.71 | 73| 16.681 | | | | entirety| 1,437.95 | 75|  |  |  | | 2 1.      Ho: ui=uj Ha: ui?uj  2. A. Conditions: shown above 3.

  ledge two holds brands whose mean sugar content is different from the otherwise shelves based on all the f statistics in the Tukey table. ?????????????         shelf 2 is different than shelf 1 at the .01 substance level ?????????????        Â ledge 2 is different than shelf 3 at the ! .05 significance level * shelf 2 has a going away from Shelf 1 of 4.2 for sugar content. * Shelf 2 has a difference from Shelf 3 of 3.1 for sugar content. ?        Shelf 1 and shelf 3 are not significantly different   Post hoc  abstract| | | | Tukey simultaneous parity t-values (d.f. = 73)| | | shelf 1| shelf 3| shelf 2| | | 5.1| 6.5| 9.6| shelf 1| 5.1|  |  |  | shelf 3| 6.5| 1.23|  |  |...If you want to pay off a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper