.

Monday, February 18, 2019

Criminal Evidence Essays -- essays research papers

Evidence is the key chemical shargon in determining the guilt or innocence of those accused of crimes against baseball club in a criminal court of law. Evidence can recognise in the form of weapons, documents, pictures, memorialize recordings and DNA. According to the American Heritage College dictionary, secernate is the documentary or oral statements and the material objects admissible as witness in a court of law (476). It is shown in court as an item of proof, to impeach or rehabilitate a witness, and to determine a sentence. This paper will examine two remove cases, O.J. Simpson and Daniel Taylor.Perhaps the about famous case in the 20th century was the O. J. Simpson double carrying into action trial. On June 12, 1994, two people were brutally killed. Those two people were Nicole brown Simpson, O.J. Simpsons ex-wife, and Ronald Goldman. O.J. was arrested the next day and charged with their murder. O.J. pleaded innocent to murder and went to trial in criminal court. The re was a load of severalizes at the residence of Nicoles to charge him with two counts of first degree murder and it seemed al roughly impracticable for O.J. to be found innocent.There were loads of evidences found at the film and O.J.s home. The bodies of both Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman, blood of the victims, shoe prints and other evidences. But, one of the of import evidence was the questionable bloody glove found behind the guesthouse, which was turn up by DNA testing to have O.J.s, Nicoles and Rons blood and hair on it. Fibers were also found on the glove that came from O.J.s shirt and his Bronco (CNN). In addition, a bloody footprint which matched O.J.s shoes, blood on O.J.s Bronco door, on the console, on the interior side of the door, a bloody footprint in the Bronco, bloody socks in O.J.s house, O.J.s injured finger, blood found at Nicoles condominium that matched O.J.s, and so on (CNN). But, the defense claimed that the evidence had been planted.Eyewitnesses ar a lso an outstanding piece of evidence. Allen Wattenberg, a lingua storeowner, testified during the preliminary hearing that O.J. bought a 14-inch Stiletto stab from his store. O.J.s limo driver arrived to drive O.J. to the airport and saw a dreary man, with the same build as O.J. sprinting across the lawn towards O.J.s house. When O.J. answered the door, he said hed been napping (CNN). Simpsons house guest stated that he saw Simpson pulled up in the white bro... ...ture on the bond slip appeared to be Taylors signature. Unlike O.J. there was no DNA linking him to the crime setting or the bodies.Again, all the evidences pointed favorably toward Daniel Taylor and notwithstanding the evidences presented, the jury found Taylor guilty of murder. In closing arguments, Needhand and Bishcoff sought to degrade the officers who had testified for Taylor, accusing them of covering up sloppy record keeping for venerate they would be blamed for letting Taylor leave jail early to perpetra te murders (Chicago tribune). In addition, the prosecutor used Daniels confession on memorialise to convict him. Paperwork is not foolproof, Bishcoff, the prosecutor, said. But Ill tell you what is foolproof. And what is foolproof are the defendants own words (Chicago tribune).REFERENCEDNA reproduce (1997) Encarta Encylopaedia 1997Blood truths, Why the Police Want to Tag Your Body Helen ONeill, The Australian 6.12.1997Flaws in New DNA DatabaseSimon Kearny, The Sydney Telegraph 22.04.2001Jail For raper Caught by DNANoula Tsavdaridis, The Advertiser 21.10.2000The American Heritage College Dictionary, 3rd edition, 1997, Houghton Mifflin Company, capital of Massachusetts MA, 476. Criminal Evidence Essays -- essays research papers Evidence is the key element in determining the guilt or innocence of those accused of crimes against decree in a criminal court of law. Evidence can flummox in the form of weapons, documents, pictures, tape recordings and DNA. According to the American Heritage College dictionary, evidence is the documentary or oral statements and the material objects admissible as affirmation in a court of law (476). It is shown in court as an item of proof, to impeach or rehabilitate a witness, and to determine a sentence. This paper will examine two murder cases, O.J. Simpson and Daniel Taylor.Perhaps the most famous case in the 20th century was the O. J. Simpson double murder trial. On June 12, 1994, two people were brutally killed. Those two people were Nicole cook Simpson, O.J. Simpsons ex-wife, and Ronald Goldman. O.J. was arrested the next day and charged with their murder. O.J. pleaded innocent to murder and went to trial in criminal court. There was a load of evidences at the residence of Nicoles to charge him with two counts of first degree murder and it seemed almost unrealizable for O.J. to be found innocent.There were loads of evidences found at the scene and O.J.s home. The bodies of both Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldm an, blood of the victims, shoe prints and other evidences. But, one of the chief(prenominal) evidence was the questionable bloody glove found behind the guesthouse, which was proven by DNA testing to have O.J.s, Nicoles and Rons blood and hair on it. Fibers were also found on the glove that came from O.J.s shirt and his Bronco (CNN). In addition, a bloody footprint which matched O.J.s shoes, blood on O.J.s Bronco door, on the console, on the interior side of the door, a bloody footprint in the Bronco, bloody socks in O.J.s house, O.J.s injured finger, blood found at Nicoles condo that matched O.J.s, and so on (CNN). But, the defense claimed that the evidence had been planted.Eyewitnesses are also an grievous piece of evidence. Allen Wattenberg, a knife storeowner, testified during the preliminary hearing that O.J. bought a 14-inch Stiletto knife from his store. O.J.s limo driver arrived to drive O.J. to the airport and saw a discolor man, with the same build as O.J. sprinting acr oss the lawn towards O.J.s house. When O.J. answered the door, he said hed been napping (CNN). Simpsons house guest stated that he saw Simpson pulled up in the white bro... ...ture on the bond slip appeared to be Taylors signature. Unlike O.J. there was no DNA linking him to the crime scene or the bodies.Again, all the evidences pointed favorably toward Daniel Taylor and in spite of the evidences presented, the jury found Taylor guilty of murder. In closing arguments, Needhand and Bishcoff sought to disregard the officers who had testified for Taylor, accusing them of covering up sloppy record keeping for care they would be blamed for letting Taylor leave jail early to take out murders (Chicago tribune). In addition, the prosecutor used Daniels confession on tape to convict him. Paperwork is not foolproof, Bishcoff, the prosecutor, said. But Ill tell you what is foolproof. And what is foolproof are the defendants own words (Chicago tribune).REFERENCEDNA fingerprint (1997) Encar ta Encylopaedia 1997Blood truths, Why the Police Want to Tag Your Body Helen ONeill, The Australian 6.12.1997Flaws in New DNA DatabaseSimon Kearny, The Sydney Telegraph 22.04.2001Jail For rapist Caught by DNANoula Tsavdaridis, The Advertiser 21.10.2000The American Heritage College Dictionary, 3rd edition, 1997, Houghton Mifflin Company, capital of Massachusetts MA, 476.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.