Is it Possible to Forecast Financial Schenanigans Essay -- essays rese

IntroductionI found Peregrines story on the Internet while doing a Google search. As I was reading fiscal Shenanigans from Horward Schilit to prepare for the level 2 of the CFA examination, I decided to have a closer look at the monetary statements of Peregrine Systems Inc. that were published onward the shenanigans became publicly known (in May 2002) in order to detect those shenanigans only if based on those financial statements more specifically on the forms 10K filed by Peregrine between 1998 an 2001.Here is a summary of the story, quoted from the court that had to territory on those irregularities1.Peregrine Systems, Inc. (Peregrine) was a computer parcel caller-out head soak uped in San Diego, California. Peregrine was incorporated in California in 1981 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1994. From its initial public offering (initial offering) in April 1997 until it was delisted on noble-minded 30, 2002, Peregrine was a publicly held corporation whose shares were regi stered securities traded under the symbol PRGN on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation system (NASDAQ), a depicted object securities exchange that used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce and the mails.2. Peregrine demonstrable and sold communication channel software and related services. Software license fees accounted for the volume of Peregrines publicly reported tax incomes. Peregrine sold its software directly by its own sales organization and indirectly done resellers such as value added resellers and systems integrators.3. From its initial public offering in April 1997 through the get out ended June 2001, Peregrine reported 17 consecutive quarters of tax income growth, always meeting or beating securities analysts expectations. Peregrines channel price soared from its April 1997 IPO price of approximately $2.25 per share (split adjusted) to approximately $80 per share in March 2000. By March 2002, Peregrine had iss ued over 192 million shares.4. In May 2002, Peregrine bring out that its prior public reports had been materially ludicrous and that it had employed a variety of devices, schemes and fraudulent accounting practices over an blanket(a) period of time in order to portray itself as utmost more healthy and successful that it actually was. After Peregrine give away its true financial results and condition, its line of reasoning price dropped precipitously and now trades at below $1 per share... ...the shrinking size of the 10K that went from 1330 pages in 1999 to 154 pages in 2001. That implies that the federation disclosed significantly less information on the way it constructed its financial statements.This study also found some weaker warnings, but failed to find the bosom of the gimmicks. I dont think that those warnings could lead to any determination by themselves, as there may be some mental disorder even in a healthy company.What actually happened?Peregrine increase rev enue by recording sales to resellers that werent finalsSold fabricated invoices to banksImproperly accounted for cash collectionImproperly wrote off receivablesImproperly accounted for stock optionsFailed to maintained adequate books and recordsIt seems that even if they inflated revenue, they had a strong production line activity (even if it wasnt as large as what their statements indicated) the other gimmicks didnt involve revenue. Their stock price, which hit a low of $2.25 during the crisis, is now merchandise in the $20 range Is it Possible to Forecast financial Schenanigans strain -- essays rese IntroductionI found Peregrines story on the Internet while doing a Google search. As I was reading Financial Shenanigans from Horward Schilit to prepare for the level 2 of the CFA examination, I decided to have a closer look at the financial statements of Peregrine Systems Inc. that were published ahead the shenanigans became publicly known (in May 2002) in order to detect those shenanigans solely based on those financial statements more specifically on the forms 10K filed by Peregrine between 1998 an 2001.Here is a summary of the story, quoted from the court that had to master on those irregularities1.Peregrine Systems, Inc. (Peregrine) was a computer software company headquartered in San Diego, California. Peregrine was incorporated in California in 1981 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1994. From its initial public offering (IPO) in April 1997 until it was delisted on appalling 30, 2002, Peregrine was a publicly held corporation whose shares were registered securities traded under the symbol PRGN on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation system (NASDAQ), a national securities exchange that used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce and the mails.2. Peregrine certain and sold business software and related services. Software license fees accounted for the quite a little of Peregrines publi cly reported revenues. Peregrine sold its software directly through its own sales organization and indirectly through resellers such as value added resellers and systems integrators.3. From its IPO in April 1997 through the quarter ended June 2001, Peregrine reported 17 consecutive quarters of revenue growth, always meeting or beating securities analysts expectations. Peregrines stock price soared from its April 1997 IPO price of approximately $2.25 per share (split adjusted) to approximately $80 per share in March 2000. By March 2002, Peregrine had issued over 192 million shares.4. In May 2002, Peregrine disclosed that its prior public reports had been materially monstrous and that it had employed a variety of devices, schemes and fraudulent accounting practices over an all-inclusive period of time in order to portray itself as far more healthy and successful that it actually was. After Peregrine disclosed its true financial results and condition, its stock price dropped precipit ously and now trades at below $1 per share... ...the shrinking size of the 10K that went from 1330 pages in 1999 to 154 pages in 2001. That implies that the company disclosed significantly less information on the way it constructed its financial statements.This study also found some weaker warnings, but failed to find the midsection of the gimmicks. I dont think that those warnings could lead to any result by themselves, as there may be some perturbation even in a healthy company.What actually happened?Peregrine hyperbolic revenue by recording sales to resellers that werent finalsSold ludicrous invoices to banksImproperly accounted for cash collectionImproperly wrote off receivablesImproperly accounted for stock optionsFailed to maintained adequate books and recordsIt seems that even if they inflated revenue, they had a strong business activity (even if it wasnt as large as what their statements indicated) the other gimmicks didnt involve revenue. Their stock price, which hit a low of $2.25 during the crisis, is now concern in the $20 range