Family Violence Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Family Violence Law - Case Study grammatical caseThis paper analyzes the arguments in favor of and against treating Marcia as guilty. The Case Marcia Norman, 39, and her husband, Mitchell, had been married for 25 years and had several children. Mitchell did non work. He coerce Marcia to make money by prostitution, and he made fun of that fact ahead family and friends. He beat her if she resisted going to a truck stop and offering her body. On a hardly a(prenominal) occasions, he made her eat out of the pets bowls and insisted that she bark like a dog. He jeopardize to slaughter or maim her numerous times. Marcia and Mitchell got along very well when he was sober. But former(a) one morning, he was intoxicated when he went to a highway rest area where Marcia was prostituting herself and assaulted her. He continue beating her all day after they got home. She called the police and was told to come in and file a complaint, merely she was afraid that he would kill her if she had h im arrested. She ingested a bottle of pills, then panicked and called EMS. Her husband cursed her as the paramedics treated her and urged them to let her die. afterwards they left, Mitchell continued to slap, kick and throw objects at Marcia. At one point, he put a cigarette out on her upper torso, causing a small burn. After he fell asleep, Marcia took their baby to her mothers so that she would not wake him, returned with a pistol and killed him. At trial, Marcia pleads self-defense, which is defined as the necessity, real or reasonably apparent, of killing an unlawful aggressor to bear oneself from imminent death or great bodily harm (Given Case). When we consider the case North Carolina v. Judy Ann Laws Norman, we weed argue that Marcia is not guilty even though she killed her sleeping husband. Judy Norman suffered a lot from the turn over of her husband. Her husband forced her into prostitution and when opposed, she suffered a great deal of physical and psychological abuse from her husband. It was demanding for her to defend herself when she and her husband were in a physical encounter. So she killed him while he was sleeping. A troika judge panel of the intermediate appellate court, in a unanimous opinion held that there was adequate evidence to support a charge of reasonable self-defense (Angel 21). The above verdict is applicable in the case of Marcia also. She had no other way to escape from the brutalities of her husband. It should be noted that Mitchel (husband), disrespected her individuality and identity and forced her to live in accordance with the guidelines given by him. He used his physical and domineering attitude to attack her both physically and mentally. Mitchel was denying Marcia the right to live on an equitable level as him. If Marcia had failed to kill him, he would have killed her. Using the Self-Defense argument could be a reasonable defense at heart this case. Under these circumstances, Marcia can argue that she tried to sa ve her life from a certain death. According to U.S. authoritative Court Justice Samuel Alito self-defense is a basic right, recognized by many legal systems from quaint times to the present (Killing in Self-Defense). The general criminal law allows for the use of deadly force anytime a faultless victim reasonably believes that unlawful force which will cause death or labored bodily harm is about to be used on him(Hobart). Marcia believes that her life is in danger and her husband may kill her at any time. It is reasonable for Marcia